Международный научный журнал «Аграрное образование и наука»

При содействии Университета науки и техники штата Айова

Материалы для бесплатной публикации отправлять сюда: a-nauka@mail.ru | Требования к оформлению

ISSN 2309-7671

Key title:
Agrarnoe obrazovanie i nauka

Abbreviated key title:
Agrar. obraz. nauka

Quality and consumer properties of a circus realized in a trading network of Asbest city of Sverdlovsk region

Lihacheva E. I., kandidat tehnicheskih nauk, dotsent kafedry «Kormleniya zhivotnyh, ekspertizy kormov i prodovolstvennyh tovarov», Uralskiy gosudarstvennyy agrarnyy universitet

This article presents the results of research on the quality of three types of grit (unground buckwheat, millet and uncrushed oat). Researches were conducted for compliance with organoleptic and physico-chemical indicators of the quality of grit with the requirements of the current regulatory documentation, and their consumer properties were also studied. It is shown that all grits are in accordance with the requirements of standards. Studies of the physicochemical parameters revealed that unground buckwheat belonged to the first class, which corresponded to the information indicated in the marking. Grain millet polished related to the quality of the highest grade, although these data were not indicated in the marking of grits. Uncrushed oat belonged to the second grade (the first grade was indicated). The remaining physico-chemical parameters (mass fraction of moisture, contamination and contamination by pests, metal-magnetic impurity complied with the requirements of product standards. The best consumer properties had unground buckwheat and millet polished, having a shorter cooking time of 26 and 29 minutes, and for uncrushed oat - 55 minutes. The increase in volume after cooking was respectively 4.6; 4.7 and 3.0 times. According to the results of the scoring of the organoleptic indices of cooked grits, unground buckwheat and millet polished were of excellent quality (100 and 96 points, respectively), and uncrushed oat was of good quality (88 points).

References

1. GOST 3034–75. Krupa ovsyanaya. Tehnicheskie usloviya. – M.: Standartinform, 2010. – 11s.
2. GOST R 55290-2012. Krupa grechnevaya. Obschie tehnicheskie usloviya. – M.: Standartinform, 2014. – 13s.
3. GOST 572-2016. Krupa psheno shlifovannoe. Tehnicheskie usloviya. – M.: Standartinform, 2016 – 10s.
4. GOST 26312.1–84. Krupa. Pravila priemki i metody otbora prob. – M.: Standartinform. – 2010. – 5s.
5. 5 GOST 26312–84. Krupa. Metody opredeleniya zarazhennosti vreditelyami hlebnyh zapasov (s Izmeneniem #1). – M.: Standartinform. – 2010 – 4s.
6. GOST 20239–74. Muka, krupa i otrubi. Metod opredeleniya metallomagnitnoy primesi (s Izmeneniem #1) – M.: Standartinform. – 2010. – 43s.
7. GOST 26312-84. Krupa. Metody opredeleniya organolepticheskih pokazateley, razvarivaemosti grechnevoy krupy i ovsyanyh hlopiev (s Izmeneniem #1) – M.: Standartinform, 2010. – 4s.
8. GOST 26312.4–84. Krupa. Metody opredeleniya krupnosti ili nomera, primesey i dobrokachestvennogo yadra. – M.: Standartinform. – 2010. – 5s.
9. GOST 26312.7–88. Krupa. Metod opredeleniya vlazhnosti. M.: Standartinform, 2010. – 5s.
10. Bykova E.S., Rozhdestvenskaya L.N., Pogorova V.D., Gosman D.V., Bychkov A.L., Lomovskiy O.I. Tehnologicheskie osobennosti i perspektivy ispolzovaniya rastitelnyh belkov v industrii pitaniya. Chast 1. Analiz pischevoy i biologicheskoy tsennosti vysokobelkovyh produktov rastitelnogo proishozhdeniya // Hranenie i pererabotka selskohozyaystvennogo syrya. #2. 2018. – S.53–57.
11. Ivanov T.N. Tovarovedenie i ekspertiza zernomuchnyh tovarov. – M.: «Akademiya». 2015. – 368s.
12. Itogi raboty predpriyatiy pischevoy i pererabatyvayuschey promyshlennosti Rossii za yanvar – sentyabr 2018g. // Pischevaya promyshlennost. #2. 2019. – S.8–9.
13. Marin V.A. Vereschagin A.L., Bychin N.V. Vliyanie razmera zerna grechihi na svoystva grechnevoy krupy // Hranenie i pererabotka selskohozyaystvennogo syrya. #1. 2017. – S.5–8.
14. Machihin S.A., Ryndin A.A., Vasiliev A.M., Strelyuhina A.N. Kachestvo semennogo i prodovolstvennogo zerna – odin iz aspektov prodovolstvennoy bezopasnosti Rossii // Hranenie i pererabotka selskohozyaystvennogo syrya. #4. – 2018. – S.139–146.
15. Stepuro M.V., Haprova E.N. Sravnitelnaya otsenka biologicheskoy tsennosti belkov rastitelnogo proishozhdeniya // Pischevaya tehnologiya. #4. 2010. – S.34–35.
16. Himicheskiy sostav pischevyh produktov. Kn. 2. Spravochnye tablitsy soderzhaniya aminokislot, zhirnyh kislot, vitaminov, makro– i mikroelementov, organicheskih kislot i uglevodov / Pod red. I.M. Skurihina i M.N. Volgareva. – 2-e izd. perer. i dop. – M.: Agrompromizat, 1987. – 360s.
17. Himicheskiy sostav pischevyh produktov. Spravochnye tablitsy soderzhaniya osnovnyh pischevyh veschestv i energeticheskoy tsennosti pischevyh produktov / Pod red. I.M. Skurihina i M.N. Volgareva. – M.: Agropromizan, 1987, T.1. – 224 s.

Read PDF Back to contents
Background